You're Worse at Recruitment Than You Think
Let me guess how your last interview went.
You started by introducing your company. Talked about your mission. Explained the role. Shared your exciting growth plans. The candidate nodded along, asked a few questions, you had a great chat about your business.
You walked away thinking: "Great interview!"
Reality: You just learned nothing and taught them exactly how to fake their way through your process.
The Interview You Think You're Having vs. The One You're Actually Having
Here's what you think happened: You had a productive conversation to assess if this person can do the job.
Here's what actually happened: You talked for 80% of the time about your favorite topic (your business) while the candidate took mental notes on exactly what you want to hear.
You literally gave them the answer key before the test.
Why Founders Are Terrible at Recruitment
I've been a trained recruiter for 22 years. I've conducted thousands of interviews. I was trained like a sommelier - years of learning to detect the subtle notes of BS, the full-bodied flavor of genuine expertise, the bitter aftertaste of a cultural mismatch.
And you know what? When I interview for my own business, I fall into the exact same trap as you.
Why? Because I put on my proud founder hat instead of my master recruiter hat. I get excited about my business. I want to share my vision. I want them to love what we're building.
And that's exactly when everything goes wrong.
The Craft You Don't Know You Don't Know
Here's what you're probably doing: Using the same five questions for every role. Maybe tweaking one or two for technical skills. Calling it good.
Here's what master recruitment actually looks like:
Every interview is architected from scratch based on the specific role.
Interviewing a CFO? I'm building questions that reveal their relationship with risk, their ability to translate numbers into strategy, their courage to say no to the CEO.
Interviewing a sales person? Completely different architecture. Questions designed to uncover their recovery from rejection, their process discipline when nobody's watching, their ability to read invisible buying signals.
Customer service? Another blueprint entirely. Questions that expose their emotional regulation, their ability to find satisfaction in thankless work, their genuine (not performed) empathy.
You can't Google these questions. They're crafted based on knowing exactly what makes someone succeed or fail in each specific role.
Why I Can Read People and You Can't
You think you're good at reading people because you've hired for your company. You've seen maybe 50-100 candidates in your specific industry, for your specific roles, through your specific (probably terrible) onboarding process.
I've assessed thousands across every industry. I see patterns you don't even know exist.
I know that the candidate who says "I love challenging environments" has never actually been challenged.
I know that "I'm a perfectionist" means they'll bottleneck your entire operation.
I know that extensive volunteering experience often masks an inability to handle workplace conflict.
These aren't hunches. They're patterns that emerge after 22 years of seeing how people actually perform versus how they interview. As culture architects, we deal with the aftermath of bad hiring every single day. We see what you missed in the interview play out in devastating detail six months later.
Your sample size is your company. My sample size is every company.
The Architecture of a Real Interview
When I wear my recruiter hat (not my founder hat), here's what happens:
Phase 1: The Blank Canvas (20 minutes) No company introduction. No role description. Just questions that reveal their authentic work patterns before they know what I want to hear.
Phase 2: The Pressure Test (20 minutes) Role-specific scenarios designed to reveal not what they know, but how they think. Each question specifically crafted to expose the exact competencies this role requires.
Phase 3: The Archaeology (15 minutes) Digging three layers deep on every claim. "Tell me about that." "What specifically did you do?" "What was the actual result?" Until stories become facts.
Phase 4: The Reveal (5 minutes) Only NOW do I share about the company and role. Their questions at this point tell me everything about their real motivation.
The Red Flags You're Missing
After decades of cleaning up bad hires, I spot red flags like a TSA agent spots water bottles.
But you? You're missing them because you don't have the pattern recognition:
The candidate who interviews you instead of being interviewed (they'll manage up, not down)
The philosophy speaker who avoids specifics (no real experience, just good at consuming content)
The "culture fit" who agrees with everything (they'll never push back when you need it)
The overexplainer who fills every silence (they can't handle uncertainty)
You see an engaged candidate. I see someone who'll crumble under ambiguity.
Why Even Good Recruiters Aren't Enough
Here's the kicker: Even agencies and headhunters often miss the mark.
They're great at finding people. But unless they're trained in behavioral interviewing AND understand your specific context AND know how to architect role-specific assessments, they're just making introductions.
Finding candidates isn't recruitment. Assessment is recruitment. And assessment is a craft that takes years to master.
The Brutal Truth
You're not bad at recruitment because you're not smart enough.
You're bad at it because:
You don't have the pattern recognition that comes from thousands of interviews
You're emotionally invested in selling rather than assessing
You're using the same generic questions for wildly different roles
You have no idea what actually predicts success (hint: it's not what they tell you)
Your excitement blinds you. Your pride deafens you. Your hope makes you see potential where there's only problems.
Your Next Hire
You have two options:
Keep doing what you're doing. Keep having "great conversations" with people who tell you exactly what you taught them to say.
Admit that recruitment is a craft you haven't mastered. Get someone who has.
Because here's what I know after two decades of fixing bad hires:
The cost of professional recruitment is nothing compared to the cost of amateur mistakes.
You wouldn't let an enthusiastic amateur handle your finances, legal work, or product development.
Why are you letting one handle your most important decisions?
(That amateur is you, by the way.)
P.S. - If you just thought "but I'm actually pretty good at reading people," you're exactly who needs this message most. The worst recruiters always think they're naturals. The best ones know it's a craft that demands constant refinement. And even we get it wrong when we forget to take off our founder hat and put on our recruiter hat.