HR: The Department That Does Everything and Changes Nothing
HR departments are busy. Incredibly busy.
Recruitment processes with 47 steps. Onboarding checklists that rival NASA protocols. Performance review systems that require advanced degrees to navigate. Policy manuals thicker than phone books.
All this activity. All this structure. All this process.
And yet...
Turnover rates haven't improved.
Employee engagement scores remain flat.
Culture problems persist year after year.
The same leadership issues keep recurring.
How is it possible to be so busy and so ineffective simultaneously?
The Overengineering Problem
Most HR departments have confused complexity with competence.
They've built elaborate systems for everything:
12-stage interview processes for roles that could be assessed in 3
Onboarding programs that take weeks to cover what matters in days
Performance management systems that measure everything except actual performance
Training modules that nobody remembers completing, let alone applying
Each system feels important in isolation. Together, they create bureaucratic quicksand.
The Strategic Void
While HR teams are perfecting their processes, they're missing the strategic questions:
What specific business outcome is this HR initiative supposed to drive?
If we eliminated this process entirely, what would actually break?
Are we measuring effort or measuring impact?
How does this connect to revenue, profit, or competitive advantage?
Most HR professionals can't answer these questions. They're too busy administering the machine they've built.
What Strategic HR Actually Looks Like
Strategic HR isn't about having more processes. It's about having the right ones.
Intentional: Every HR activity should solve a specific business problem or create a measurable advantage.
Strategic: HR decisions should advance company goals, not just satisfy compliance requirements.
Leveraged: HR systems should multiply human capability, not multiply human workload.
Example: Instead of a 6-week onboarding program covering everything, create a 3-day intensive covering only what new hires need to be productive immediately. Then measure time-to-contribution, not completion rates.
The Reset Question
If you rebuilt your HR function from scratch tomorrow, knowing what you know about your business needs, what would you actually create?
Probably something much simpler. Much more focused. Much more connected to business results.
The question isn't whether your HR department is busy enough.
The question is whether it's impactful enough.
Because activity without impact isn't strategic.
It's just expensive theater.
Where to Start
Pick one HR process that consumes significant time or resources.
Ask: What business problem is this supposed to solve?
Then ask: Is it actually solving that problem?
If the answer is no, you have two choices: Fix it or eliminate it.
But don't keep feeding the machine that creates work without creating value.
Your business deserves HR that drives results, not just paperwork.